Korn

indeed i will

indeed you shall

inderd

indeedy this is my 1000th post

Phil wrote:

yeah, you tend to get too emotionally involved in your arguments. that usually becomes your undoing. at some point you'll learn to control this, and thus the argument. if they raise a good point, concede that to them, but realize it doesn't necessary render your argument invalid. an arguer should always be willing to listen to reason, else it becomes pointless bickering

I know, I start out arguements very well, and at times finish them just as well, but eventually, I get tired of the endless bickering and get to the point where I don't care what the other person says, I just want them to shut the fuck up (metaphorically, unless they talk to their computer) but I've been trying to keep a clearer head lately and it's been doing me well

yeah, that's what you gotta do. if you let your emotions overcome you, your argument tends to weaken. emotions and reason tend to be polar opposites haha

Thanks for the advice, also, I'd like to add: Thread officially de-railed

we rock!!!

Oh yeah

Knightfall wrote:

Oh, I would've loved a rant, I didn't want to get Kyle and Kent up in arms again

If I may...

I was getting a haircut during the nearly entire arguement. And for the part I was present for, I was arguing that it was stupid to judge singles based on them being singles, not judging a band based on singles. Its a completely different theory, because even you can admit that there ARE good singles, but at the time, you were just ranting on about how singles sucked. It seemed like an unfair assessment.

there are good singles, but mostly, they aren't a band's BEST songs. The majority of people want something catchy rather than technically and lyrically talented. Just a fact of life. Some artists are good enough to do both, but the majority put out anything that's marketable. Knighty's side started to deteriorate as time went on, but he was the lone man standing, and the others logic was ill-based, but they had rule of the majority....kinda like how singles normally do.....

indeed phil

TIMMMY!

Kyle wrote:

Knightfall wrote:

Oh, I would've loved a rant, I didn't want to get Kyle and Kent up in arms again

If I may...

I was getting a haircut during the nearly entire arguement. And for the part I was present for, I was arguing that it was stupid to judge singles based on them being singles, not judging a band based on singles. Its a completely different theory, because even you can admit that there ARE good singles, but at the time, you were just ranting on about how singles sucked. It seemed like an unfair assessment.

It seems you're up in arms anyway

I wasn't ranting about singles sucking, I was ranting about how stupid it is to base your entire opinion of a band/artist based solely on their singles

Knightfall wrote:

Kyle wrote:

Knightfall wrote:

Oh, I would've loved a rant, I didn't want to get Kyle and Kent up in arms again

If I may...

I was getting a haircut during the nearly entire arguement. And for the part I was present for, I was arguing that it was stupid to judge singles based on them being singles, not judging a band based on singles. Its a completely different theory, because even you can admit that there ARE good singles, but at the time, you were just ranting on about how singles sucked. It seemed like an unfair assessment.

It seems you're up in arms anyway

I wasn't ranting about singles sucking, I was ranting about how stupid it is to base your entire opinion of a band/artist based solely on their singles

intresting

i will nevr realse a single!unless it will make me lots of moneys

Knightfall wrote:

Kyle wrote:

Knightfall wrote:

Oh, I would've loved a rant, I didn't want to get Kyle and Kent up in arms again

If I may...

I was getting a haircut during the nearly entire arguement. And for the part I was present for, I was arguing that it was stupid to judge singles based on them being singles, not judging a band based on singles. Its a completely different theory, because even you can admit that there ARE good singles, but at the time, you were just ranting on about how singles sucked. It seemed like an unfair assessment.

It seems you're up in arms anyway

I wasn't ranting about singles sucking, I was ranting about how stupid it is to base your entire opinion of a band/artist based solely on their singles

I know you were. But at the beginning of the arguement, you hadn't made that clear. you were all SINGLES SUCK! SINGLES SUCK! YOU CAN'T LIKE SINGLES! SINGLES ARE HORRIBLE! WHY WOULD YOU LIKE ANY BANDS THAT HAVE SINGLES!?!?!

Ok, maybe not quite that dramatic. But you get my point. And so that's what I argued against. Then, by the time the arguement was over, you kindof switched gears and made yourself more clear.

hahahahaha

OMG lol

Korn is awesome...

yes.......

Fieldy rawks

Phil wrote:

Fieldy rawks

Don't forget Jon Davis

he's good too, but fieldy's my fave

I like them both the same, they're the driving force behind Korn

indeed knight